For those who believed the lengthy conflict between Ripple Labs and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) was nearing its end, recent developments suggest otherwise. Ripple executives have taken to social media, particularly on X (formerly Twitter), to express their discontent with the SEC’s disregard for a recent court decision concerning XRP.
The Legal Clash: Ripple and the SEC
Despite a court ruling that appeared favorable to Ripple, Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, has openly challenged the SEC’s persistent assertion that XRP qualifies as a security. Joining him in this criticism, Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlinghouse, has labeled the SEC as a “renegade agency,” highlighting the escalating tension.
The roots of Ripple’s issues with the SEC trace back to the company’s early days. Launched in 2012, Ripple quickly gained prominence within the industry. By 2013, the company had rebranded to Ripple Labs and had formed a significant partnership with Germany’s Fidor Bank. Ripple’s distinctive decentralization approach and consensus mechanism established its reputation as a major player in cross-border payments.
Advertisement Banner
However, Ripple’s burgeoning success came with challenges. The SEC initiated an investigation into the company, a situation that has persisted, creating a ripple effect throughout the industry.
A Court Victory: The Bitnomial Case
Ripple’s recent public outcry was sparked by the judge’s ruling in the Bitnomial case. Bitnomial, a well-known crypto derivatives exchange, had filed a lawsuit against the SEC in Illinois, contesting the agency’s jurisdiction over XRP Futures contracts. Bitnomial argued that XRP does not qualify as a security and that its sale in the secondary market does not constitute a sale of investment contracts.
In a significant development, US District Judge Analisa Torres ruled in favor of Bitnomial, affirming that XRP is not a security. This ruling was a notable win for Ripple Labs and its stakeholders. However, the SEC’s persistence in viewing Ripple’s token as a security remains unchanged.
Ripple’s Legal Team Challenges the SEC’s Position
Following the court’s decision, Ripple’s legal team criticized the SEC’s stance, arguing that its actions undermine the agency’s integrity and legitimacy. Alderoty has gone so far as to label the SEC’s position as unconstitutional, suggesting it damages the agency’s credibility.
Brad Garlinghouse, via his Twitter/X account, voiced the frustration felt within Ripple Labs. He described the SEC’s behavior as having reached a “new low,” accusing the agency of acting as though it is above the law by disregarding a court ruling.
Support for Ripple Beyond the Crypto Industry
Ripple Labs is not without allies outside the crypto industry. Legal experts like John Deaton and Bill Morgan have questioned the SEC’s approach and intentions in the Ripple case. Deaton highlighted a recent case involving Digital Licensing, where the SEC’s conduct was called into question, prompting further scrutiny of its policies and methods.
The ongoing saga between Ripple and the SEC continues to unfold, with significant implications for the broader cryptocurrency landscape. As Ripple’s team remains vigilant, the industry watches closely to see how this legal battle will ultimately shape the future of digital assets and regulatory practices.
