
The Controversial Pardon of Binance Founder: Analyzing Business and Political Connections
In a surprising move, former U.S. President Donald Trump issued a pardon to Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, the founder of the renowned cryptocurrency exchange Binance, in late October. This decision has ignited a whirlwind of discussions about possible links between business transactions and political favors.
Binance’s Involvement with a Trump-Affiliated Enterprise
Reports indicate that Binance was involved in supporting World Liberty Financial, a cryptocurrency venture linked to the Trump family. This enterprise introduced a stablecoin named USD1, with Binance’s engineers allegedly contributing to its development. Furthermore, a significant investor committed approximately $2 billion to the project, with some payments reportedly conducted in USD1 tokens.
Amidst these developments, CZ’s legal representative, Teresa Goody Guillén, firmly denied any allegations of a ‘pay-to-play’ scheme related to President Trump’s pardon of Changpeng Zhao. During her appearance on the Pomp Podcast, she refuted claims of a bargain, asserting there was no evidence of transactions involving cash or cryptocurrency in exchange for the pardon.
Scrutiny Intensifies with CZ’s Legal History
CZ’s previous legal issues have only intensified the scrutiny surrounding the pardon. In 2023, he admitted guilt to charges concerning inadequate efforts to prevent illicit use of Binance’s platform. After serving a four-month sentence, he received the presidential pardon in October. Critics argue that the timing and the intricate business connections warrant a thorough investigation.
Legal Team’s Firm Denial on the Pomp Podcast
During her discussion on the Pomp Podcast, Teresa Goody Guillén, CZ’s attorney, dismissed accusations of a transactional pardon as a “conglomeration of inaccuracies.” She emphasized the absence of proof suggesting the pardon was exchanged for financial gain. Guillén also contested the portrayal of World Liberty Financial as merely a Trump family enterprise.
Binance has consistently denied any involvement in negotiating the pardon in return for business assistance. Company statements attribute the substantial USD1-related investment to a group of investors, distancing Binance from direct involvement in these financial maneuvers.
Responses from Lawmakers and Advocacy Groups
The controversy has prompted calls for investigation from various quarters, including some senators and watchdog groups. They demand transparency regarding the meetings, agreements, and transactions associated with the USD1 project. The substantial scale of the $2 billion deal and interactions between business leaders and Trump affiliates are cited as reasons to pursue further inquiry.
Nevertheless, supporters of the pardon argue that CZ’s legal case was narrowly focused on compliance issues, lacking allegations of fraud. They contend that the pardon was justified based on the limited scope of the charges.
Editorial Integrity and Commitment to Quality Content
Our Editorial Process at Bitcoinist prioritizes the delivery of meticulously researched, precise, and unbiased content. We adhere to stringent sourcing standards, ensuring every article undergoes rigorous review by our team of top-tier technology experts and seasoned editors. This commitment guarantees the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.





