At the forefront of the Bitcoin 2024 conference in Nashville, former President Donald Trump presented a groundbreaking proposal to establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve (SBR) for the United States. This initiative aims to bolster the nation’s standing in the digital economy, promising economic resilience and financial sovereignty. The announcement follows Trump’s electoral success, securing significant majorities in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, which adds weight to his ambitious economic vision.
The Vision Behind the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve
“Establishing a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve will position the United States at the forefront of the digital economy, ensuring our financial sovereignty and economic resilience,” Trump declared during his keynote address. However, as visionary as it sounds, the proposal raises questions about its legal feasibility within the current legislative framework.
Can Trump Order A Strategic Bitcoin Reserve?
Advertisement Banner
The Bitcoin Policy Institute has commissioned a new legal analysis to explore the feasibility of Trump’s proposal under existing laws. This analysis, authored by attorney and startup advisor Zack Shapiro, delves into whether the US Department of the Treasury could leverage the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF) to establish an SBR.
Understanding the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF)
“The Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF) is a potent yet underutilized financial instrument that could theoretically be leveraged to acquire Bitcoin as a strategic asset,” explains Shapiro. Established in 1934 under the Gold Reserve Act during the Great Depression, the ESF was initially funded with $2 billion from the revaluation of US gold reserves. Its primary goal was to stabilize the US dollar and manage international monetary concerns, offering the Treasury Secretary considerable discretion to intervene in foreign exchange markets without direct congressional oversight.
Shapiro notes that while the ESF traditionally focused on assets like gold and foreign currencies, the statutory language does not explicitly restrict the types of financial instruments that can be leveraged, provided they serve to stabilize the dollar.
Legal Considerations for Bitcoin Acquisition
To determine the legality of using the ESF to purchase Bitcoin, Shapiro addresses two pivotal questions. First, can the ESF legally acquire Bitcoin under its authorized asset categories? Although Bitcoin does not fit neatly into traditional classifications such as gold or foreign exchange, Shapiro posits that Bitcoin could be integrated through instruments of credit.
“While Bitcoin itself is not an instrument of credit, the Treasury can engage in transactions where Bitcoin is acquired through such instruments,” Shapiro elaborates. This could involve the ESF purchasing Bitcoin-denominated debt obligations from qualified counterparties, such as financial institutions or Bitcoin mining companies, with repayments structured in Bitcoin upon maturity. This approach aligns with the ESF’s authority to “deal in… instruments of credit.”
Bitcoin’s Role in Stabilizing the Dollar
The second question involves whether acquiring Bitcoin would align with the ESF’s statutory purpose of stabilizing the exchange value of the dollar. Shapiro argues that given the unprecedented levels of US national debt and concerns over long-term economic stability, incorporating Bitcoin—a decentralized currency with a fixed supply—could enhance trust in the US financial system.
“Bitcoin’s fixed supply and deflationary nature present a credible hedge against inflation,” Shapiro asserts. “By adding Bitcoin to the national balance sheet, the US can enhance fiscal responsibility and signal innovation, potentially stabilizing the dollar’s exchange rate over the long term.”
Practical Mechanisms for Acquiring Bitcoin
Shapiro further outlines practical mechanisms through which the Treasury could acquire Bitcoin using the ESF. He suggests that the Treasury could utilize convertible instruments of credit, such as bonds or notes issued by qualified counterparties that promise repayment in Bitcoin upon maturity.
“This mechanism allows the Treasury to acquire Bitcoin without directly purchasing it on the open market, thus avoiding potential market disruptions or price spikes that could result from large direct purchases,” Shapiro explains. He concludes that the ESF was created to provide the Treasury with the flexibility to intervene in foreign exchange markets without direct congressional approval.
At the time of writing, Bitcoin is valued at $89,339, reflecting its potential as a strategic asset in the evolving economic landscape.
