
Exploring the Real Purpose and Utility of XRP: A Comprehensive Analysis
A dynamic conversation about the genuine purpose and utility of XRP has emerged on the social media platform X, sparked by renowned cryptocurrency analyst Scott Melker. He posed a direct question to his audience of over one million followers: What is the present-day pitch for XRP? His query focused specifically on the token itself, not Ripple, the company behind it.
This inquiry led to a plethora of responses from both supporters and industry experts, offering detailed insights into the functional mechanisms of the XRP Ledger and the specific role XRP plays within this ecosystem. The discussion attracted significant attention, featuring contributions from influential figures such as Santiago Velez and David Schwartz, Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer.
Understanding the Mechanisms of the XRP Ledger and the Concept of Rippling
According to crypto expert Santiago Velez, XRP plays several critical roles within the Ledger’s framework. Fundamentally, the Ledger employs XRP as a means to mitigate spam and distributed denial-of-service (DDOS) attacks. Each transaction incurs a nominal fee in XRP, serving as a deterrent against network misuse.
Beyond this technical function, Velez highlighted XRP’s design for facilitating a process known as rippling. This allows users to trade equivalent tokens within the same currency code through an intermediary account. This mechanism was integral to the Ledger’s initial design, forming part of its pioneering decentralized exchange (DEX)—a first in the cryptocurrency domain. Consequently, XRP functions as a bridge currency, enabling seamless inter-currency transactions without relying on intermediaries or centralized entities. Velez emphasized that, aside from Stellar, which was derived from an XRP fork, no other large Layer-1 blockchain shares this specific purpose.
Debating the Long-Term Viability of XRP
Following the comprehensive explanation, Melker acknowledged the Ledger’s sophisticated technology, commending it as a sophisticated and visionary design well ahead of its time. He praised its inherent features, including the anti-spam mechanism, native DEX, and bridge currency role, recognizing their solutions to real-world challenges in settlements and international payments before most contemporary blockchains emerged.
Nevertheless, Melker raised a pertinent question regarding the token’s enduring economic viability: Do these design strengths ensure sustained demand for XRP itself? He argued that while the Ledger’s features serve technical functions, they do not inherently drive consistent price growth. In his opinion, spam prevention does not inherently create demand for the token. Furthermore, pathfinding might circumvent the altcoin, and the stability and simplicity of stablecoins have garnered more institutional appeal than XRP. This raises concerns about whether XRP will achieve adoption on the scale it’s promoted.
Subsequently, Ripple’s CTO, David Schwartz, joined the dialogue to share his insights on XRP’s value. He asserted that the Ledger offers a unique proposition that no other blockchain can match: an open system where users can act as their own banks, free from intermediaries like stablecoin issuers that impose transaction fees. According to Schwartz, XRP’s distinctive position within the Ledger ensures it captures some of the value generated by network transactions. As the sole non-IOU asset accessible to every account globally, XRP enjoys a unique status that protects it from default, freezing, or clawback risks.
Editorial Integrity and Process
At bitcoinist, our editorial process is dedicated to delivering meticulously researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We maintain rigorous sourcing standards, and each article undergoes thorough review by our team of top technology experts and experienced editors. This meticulous process ensures our content’s integrity, relevance, and value for our readers.
“`





