Bitcoin Core v30.0: A Potential Legal Quagmire for Full-Node Operators
Bitcoin’s forthcoming software upgrade, Bitcoin Core version 30.0, is stirring significant discussion within the cryptocurrency community. This debate centers on the types of data permissible on the network and the legal implications for those involved in its storage and relay. Notably, cryptography expert Nick Szabo has raised concerns about the potential legal ramifications this update might pose for full-node operators.
The Legal Implications of Bitcoin Core’s Latest Update
Nick Szabo has warned that the changes in Bitcoin Core v30.0, which ease long-standing restrictions on data-carrying transactions, could amplify the legal risks faced by full-node operators. By making it easier to access and view potentially illicit content with standard software, operators might face increased liability claims, suggesting they were aware of the content being relayed or stored.
Advertisement Banner
Bitcoin Core Update: A Possible Legal Conundrum
Szabo highlighted the core issue succinctly: “What happens when full-node operators are aware of illegal content on the blockchain? Their knowledge could lead to legal challenges, as the prevailing legal precedents may not offer adequate protection.” He emphasized that the risk extends beyond technicalities into the realm of legal interpretation by lawyers, judges, and jurors, who may not fully understand the technical nuances but could perceive that operators should have been aware of the content.
Szabo elaborated that data in straightforward, standard formats, easily accessible by common software, might have a significant impact on legal proceedings. This perception risk is more pronounced than with data that is fragmented or concealed, making it crucial to consider how non-technical decision-makers perceive these issues.
Changes in OP_RETURN Policy and Their Implications
The controversy revolves around Bitcoin Core v30.0’s shift in policy regarding OP_RETURN, a script mechanism traditionally used to attach small pieces of arbitrary data to transactions. Previously, Core’s default policy limited OP_RETURN payloads to approximately 80 bytes and restricted them to one output per transaction. This non-consensus rule served to deter large data submissions without outright banning them at the protocol level.
With the new update, nodes will, by default, relay and mine transactions containing larger OP_RETURN data and allow multiple data-carrier outputs per transaction. The previously used -datacarriersize parameter now applies to the aggregate data across outputs, effectively lowering the barriers, though individual node operators may still impose stricter limits locally.
Proponents of the change argue that directing non-financial data into OP_RETURN, given its prunability, could mitigate systemic harm compared to more covert encoding methods. Szabo summarized this viewpoint, noting that allowing more data via OP_RETURN might reduce legal risks, as the alternative—concealing data in non-prunable locations—poses a greater long-term burden on nodes.
Criticism and Legal Concerns
Opponents argue that relaxing these defaults could normalize large, contiguous data payloads, making them easily retrievable by consumer apps and simplifying prosecutors’ efforts to demonstrate that node operators had knowledge of illegal material. Szabo posited that non-technical decision-makers would be more impressed by illegal content that a familiar app can access, compared to content that requires specialized tools, thus increasing the risk of operator liability.
Navigating Legal Complexities in Bitcoin Core v30.0
The legality of these changes is complicated by the intersection of technical defaults and real-world perceptions. Some industry players argue, in response to Szabo, that arbitrary data cannot be entirely prevented—whether through inscriptions in witness data, encodings in public keys, or OP_RETURN—rendering the policy debate somewhat futile.
Szabo acknowledged this practical issue but insisted that format and user experience are critical in legal contexts. If an app, similar to one on a consumer’s phone, can retrieve the data, it could heavily influence a court’s decision against a Bitcoin node operator. However, if the data requires intricate reconstruction tools, the opposite might be true.
Possible Solutions and Mitigations
Szabo proposed two classes of mitigations, albeit imperfect ones. At the software level, developers could be encouraged to make it harder for popular apps to store and access generic media via OP_RETURN or witness data, steering them away from contiguous, human-readable formats. On the policy front, legislators might consider liability frameworks that target the signers of illegal transactions rather than intermediaries like node operators. He also emphasized the importance of diversity in approaches, as legal risks and app landscapes differ by jurisdiction and over time, necessitating flexibility in developing solutions that avoid unwarranted censorship of ordinary transactions.
Importantly, Szabo clarified that he has not definitively taken a position on the update and is still “exploring the issues.” He cautioned that legal matters are complex and far removed from most developers’ expertise. As Bitcoin Core v30.0 approaches, this highlights a critical takeaway: while the technical path may be clear, the legal landscape it traverses is anything but straightforward.
Bitcoin Market Update
As of the latest update, Bitcoin is trading at $112,079.
Editorial Standards and Review Process at Bitcoinist
At Bitcoinist, our editorial process is focused on delivering meticulously researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We adhere to stringent sourcing standards, and every page undergoes thorough review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This rigorous process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.
